Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'or au lion de gu.; et deux cotices de sa., br. sur le tout.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Abernathy family of Britain.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'or au lion de gu.; et deux cotices de sa., br. sur le tout.”
The Abernathy arms were recorded in Britain, c. 1700.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in Kent.
Kent sits between London and the short crossing to Europe, and the trade passing through made it wealthy. Merchant families bought land with that money, and it was landowners who took coats of arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The surname Abernathy originates from a place name in the Perth and Kinross region of Scotland, specifically referring to the settlement located at the mouth of the Nethy River. The name itself is derived from the Gaelic words for the mouth of a river, which highlights the importance of geography to early family identity. While the name is deeply rooted in Scottish history, members of the family began to migrate and establish roots elsewhere as the centuries progressed. By the year 1700, records confirm that members of the Abernathy family were firmly settled in the county of Kent in England. During this period, families often moved to follow new economic opportunities or to seek land in different regions of the British Isles. The presence of the family in Kent suggests they were part of a broader movement of people who helped shape the local communities and social landscape of southern England during the turn of the eighteenth century.
Mouth of the River Nethy
