Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'azur au lion d'arg., cour. d'or, arm. et lamp. de sa.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Aubert family lines. Documented in 3 countries.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'azur au lion d'arg., cour. d'or, arm. et lamp. de sa.”
The Aubert arms were recorded in Franche-Comte, c. 1630.
Franche-Comte sat between France and the Empire and changed hands more than once. Border families held their land under arms and expected to defend it, so a shield was a practical thing rather than an ornament.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
In France, a coat of arms was a mark of honor that passed down through the male line to all legitimate descendants. Families often used the same shield without changes to show their shared heritage. If a branch wanted to stand out, they could add a small mark to their shield to show their specific place in the family tree.
The surname Aubert is a classic example of a name derived from ancient Germanic roots, specifically the name Adalbert, which combines the elements for noble and bright. As the name spread across France during the Middle Ages, it became a common choice for families living in various regions. By the year 1630, historical records confirm that members of the Aubert family were well-established in the Franche-Comté region. This area, located in eastern France near the border with Switzerland, was a place of significant cultural and political transition during the seventeenth century. Families like the Auberts often lived as farmers, artisans, or local officials who helped maintain the stability of their communities during this era. Their presence in Franche-Comté reflects the broader movement of families who settled in the provinces to build lives based on trade and land ownership. Over time, the name became deeply woven into the local history of the region as these early ancestors contributed to the growth of their towns and villages.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Ec.: au 1 d'or à trois têtes de chien braque de sa. (Aubert); au 2 palé d'arg. et d'azur de six pièces; au chef d'or (Vesc-Beconne); au 3 d'arg. au chev. de sa., ch. de trois roses d'arg.; au 4 d'arg.”
The Aubert arms were recorded in Londres, c. 1700.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in Kent.
Kent sits between London and the short crossing to Europe, and the trade passing through made it wealthy. Merchant families bought land with that money, and it was landowners who took coats of arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The family name Aubert arrived in Britain as part of a broader movement of people fleeing religious persecution in continental Europe during the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. By the year 1700, records indicate that members of the Aubert family had established themselves in the county of Kent. Many families with this name were part of the Huguenot community, which consisted of French Protestants seeking refuge from political and religious instability in their homeland. Upon settling in England, these individuals often integrated into the local economy by working as skilled artisans, merchants, or farmers. Their presence in Kent suggests that they were part of a wave of migration that brought new trades and cultural influences to the English countryside. Over time, the family name became firmly rooted in the region as these newcomers adapted to life in a new country while maintaining their distinct heritage.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Quarterly, 1st, or, three talbots' heads erased at the neck ppr. ; 2nd, paly of six ar. and az. a chief or; 3rd, ar. on a chev. sa. three roses of the first; 4th, ar. a lion ramp. sa. debruised with a fesse gu. all betw. three mullets of six points az”
The Aubert arms were recorded in England, c. 1620.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in York.
Yorkshire is the largest of the English counties, and it held more gentry families than any other. Land there was split among a great many households rather than a few, so a great many of them carried arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The family name Aubert traces its roots to the Germanic name Albert, which combines the elements for noble and bright. While the name originated in continental Europe, it eventually migrated across the English Channel and became established in northern England. By the year 1620, records confirm that members of the Aubert family were living in the historic city of York. During this period, York was a bustling center of trade and religious importance, suggesting that these early settlers were likely involved in the local merchant class or skilled trades. The presence of the family in such a prominent northern hub indicates that they were well-integrated into the social fabric of seventeenth-century England. Over time, the name evolved alongside the English language, maintaining its distinct identity while adapting to the customs of their new home.
Derived from Germanic elements meaning noble and bright or famous.


