Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'herm. à trois fusées de gu., rangées en fasce et vidées.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Belgrave family lines. Documented in 2 countries.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'herm. à trois fusées de gu., rangées en fasce et vidées.”
The Belgrave arms were recorded in Britain, c. 1700.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in Kent.
Kent sits between London and the short crossing to Europe, and the trade passing through made it wealthy. Merchant families bought land with that money, and it was landowners who took coats of arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The surname Belgrave is a locative name, meaning it was originally derived from a specific place rather than a trade or a personal characteristic. While the name is famously associated with the Belgrave district in London, historical records show that families bearing this name were well-established in the county of Kent by the early 1700s. During this period, the family lived as part of the local gentry and agricultural society, often appearing in parish registers that tracked births, marriages, and deaths within the Church of England. Because the name implies a connection to a "beautiful grove" or a specific estate, it is likely that early ancestors were landowners or tenants who took their name from the geography of their home. As the family grew in Kent, they participated in the local economy and social structures that defined rural British life at the turn of the eighteenth century.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Ar. on a cross sa. five fleurs-de-lis of the field”
The Belgrave arms were recorded in Suffolk, c. 1620.
Suffolk was wool country, and its cloth towns were among the wealthiest in England. Clothier families bought manors with their profits, and holding a manor was the ordinary route to a coat of arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The surname Belgrave is a locative name, meaning it originated from a specific place rather than a trade or a personal characteristic. Etymologically, the name is derived from the Old French words "bel," meaning beautiful, and "grave," which refers to a grove or a wooded area. By the early 17th century, the family had established a notable presence in the county of Suffolk, particularly around the year 1620. During this period, families in Suffolk were often involved in the thriving wool trade or local agriculture, which defined the social and economic landscape of East Anglia. As the family settled into this region, they became part of the local fabric of English village life, contributing to the agricultural and administrative development of the area long before the name spread to other parts of the country.
Latin for beautiful or fair grove or thicket.

