Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Parti de sin. et d'or; à la croix anérée de sa. (ou de gu.), br. sur le tout.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Bigot family lines. Documented in 3 countries.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Parti de sin. et d'or; à la croix anérée de sa. (ou de gu.), br. sur le tout.”
The Bigot arms were recorded in Britain, c. 1700.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in Kent.
Kent sits between London and the short crossing to Europe, and the trade passing through made it wealthy. Merchant families bought land with that money, and it was landowners who took coats of arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The surname Bigot has deep roots in medieval history, originating as a descriptive nickname in Normandy before crossing the English Channel. While the name is often associated with the powerful Bigod family of the Middle Ages, the branch that established itself in Kent by the year 1700 likely represented a different lineage of settlers or local residents. In the centuries following the Norman Conquest, the name evolved from a term used to describe a person’s perceived religious zeal or stubbornness into a stable family identifier. By the time the family appeared in Kentish parish records at the turn of the 18th century, they were part of a growing class of families who had integrated into local trade and agricultural life. Their presence in the region suggests a long transition from their continental origins to becoming firmly rooted in the social and economic fabric of southern England.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'azur au chev. d'or, acc. de trois bes. d'arg., et en chef à sen. d'une fleur-de-lis d'or.”
The Bigot arms were recorded in Rouen, c. 1663.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
In France, a coat of arms was a mark of honor that passed down through the male line to all legitimate descendants. Families often used the same shield without changes to show their shared heritage. If a branch wanted to stand out, they could add a small mark to their shield to show their specific place in the family tree.
The surname Bigot has deep roots in the historical landscape of Normandy, France. By the mid-seventeenth century, the family was well-established in the city of Rouen, which served as a major center for commerce and administration in the region. During this era, families with this name were often involved in the professional and social life of the city, contributing to the growth of the local economy and the development of the urban community. The name itself is thought to have originated as a descriptive nickname in the Middle Ages, reflecting the unique traits or social standing of early ancestors who lived in Northern France. As the family grew, members of the Bigot line became part of the fabric of Norman society, leaving behind records that document their presence in the city as early as 1663. These early generations helped define the family legacy long before modern record-keeping systems were fully developed.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Or, a cross sarcelly gu”
The Bigot arms were recorded in England, c. 1620.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in York.
Yorkshire is the largest of the English counties, and it held more gentry families than any other. Land there was split among a great many households rather than a few, so a great many of them carried arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The surname Bigot originated as a descriptive nickname in medieval France before crossing the English Channel with the Norman Conquest. While the name initially carried connotations of religious zeal or stubbornness, it eventually became a settled family name as it spread across various English regions. By the early seventeenth century, the family had established a notable presence in the city of York. Records from 1620 confirm that members of the Bigot family were living and working within this historic northern hub, participating in the local economy and community life. This transition from a descriptive label to a fixed surname reflects the broader patterns of social integration and record-keeping that defined English family history during the transition into the Stuart period.
Old French term referring to a religious hypocrite or superstitious person.


