Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'arg.; au chef de gu., ch. de trois bes. du champ.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Camoys family lines. Documented in 2 countries.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'arg.; au chef de gu., ch. de trois bes. du champ.”

The Camoys arms were recorded in France, c. 1725.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in Bretagne.
More families held coats of arms in Bretagne than anywhere else in France. The land was divided into many small estates rather than a few large ones, so far more households counted as gentry, and each needed a shield of its own to be told apart.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
In France, a coat of arms was a mark of honor that passed down through the male line to all legitimate descendants. Families often used the same shield without changes to show their shared heritage. If a branch wanted to stand out, they could add a small mark to their shield to show their specific place in the family tree.
The family name Camoys traces its roots to the rugged landscapes of Brittany, a region in northwestern France known for its distinct cultural identity. By the early eighteenth century, historical records confirm that members of the family were well established within this province. The name itself likely originated from a descriptive nickname or a reference to a specific local geography, which was a common practice for families living in rural French communities during that era. As the family navigated the social structures of the time, they became part of the local fabric of Breton society. Their presence in the region during the 1720s suggests they were part of the long-standing tradition of families who maintained deep ties to the land and the local parish systems. This period was a time of transition for many families in Brittany, as they balanced traditional agricultural life with the evolving administrative requirements of the French kingdom.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Ar. on a chief gu. three plates”

The Camoys arms were recorded in England, c. 1620.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in York.
Yorkshire is the largest of the English counties, and it held more gentry families than any other. Land there was split among a great many households rather than a few, so a great many of them carried arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The name Camoys has deep roots in English history, stretching back to the medieval period when families often took their names from specific locations. While the name is famously associated with the Barons Camoys of Broadwater in Sussex during the Middle Ages, branches of the family eventually spread across the country. By the early 17th century, records confirm that members of the family were established in York. During this time, York was a vital northern center for trade and administration, and families living there were often involved in the city’s growing merchant class or local government. These early settlers helped carry the name into a new era of English life, moving away from the feudal estates of the south and into the bustling urban environments of the north. This transition reflects the broader movement of families during the Stuart period as they sought new opportunities in England’s expanding regional cities.
A Latin term describing someone with a flat or snub nose.