Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“une antelope pass. de gu. S.: deux antelopes de gu. D.: NIL ADMIRARI.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Carew family lines. Documented in 3 countries.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“une antelope pass. de gu. S.: deux antelopes de gu. D.: NIL ADMIRARI.”
The Carew arms were recorded in France, c. 1725.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in Bretagne.
More families held coats of arms in Bretagne than anywhere else in France. The land was divided into many small estates rather than a few large ones, so far more households counted as gentry, and each needed a shield of its own to be told apart.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
In France, a coat of arms was a mark of honor that passed down through the male line to all legitimate descendants. Families often used the same shield without changes to show their shared heritage. If a branch wanted to stand out, they could add a small mark to their shield to show their specific place in the family tree.
The history of the Carew name in France is deeply tied to the rugged landscape and unique cultural identity of the Brittany region. By the early eighteenth century, members of the family were well-established in this area, which served as a vital crossroads between French and Celtic traditions. During this period, the family lived in a society defined by local parish life and the strict social structures of the Ancien Régime. Records from 1725 confirm their presence in Brittany, suggesting that the family had integrated into the local community as landowners or tradespeople. This era was a time of significant stability for families in the region, allowing the Carew name to become a recognized part of the local population. Their life in Brittany reflects the broader movement of families who settled in the western provinces of France to build lasting legacies within their parishes.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Quarterly, 1st, or, three lioncels pass. sa.; 2nd, per pale gu. and erm. a saltire counterchanged; 3rd, ar. three eagles displ. gu. ducally crowned or; 4th, quarterly, ar. and gu”
The Carew arms were recorded in Wexford, c. 1645.
Wexford was the corner of Ireland closest to Wales, settled early by Norman families. They held their land under arms and kept it for generations, which is why so many Wexford names carry recorded shields.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
The Ulster King of Arms granted coats of arms to individuals who proved their social standing and good character. These symbols were typically inherited by all legitimate descendants of the original holder. If a family branch wanted a unique look, they could apply for a specific change to their design through the office to ensure their identity remained distinct.
The Carew family name arrived in Ireland during the late twelfth century as part of the initial wave of Anglo-Norman settlers. Originally of Welsh and Norman descent, the family established a strong foothold in the southeastern region of the country. By the mid-seventeenth century, records confirm that members of the Carew family were well-established landowners in County Wexford. This period was a time of significant political upheaval in Ireland, and the family often found themselves navigating complex loyalties during the conflicts of the 1640s. Their presence in Wexford during 1645 highlights how the family had integrated into the local social and economic landscape over the preceding four hundred years. Throughout these centuries, the name became deeply tied to the history of the region, evolving from a group of military settlers into a prominent part of the local landed class.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Carington, or Smyth (co. Warwick. Visit. Warwick and Leicester, confirmed by the Deputies of Camden, Claren-ceux, to FRANCIS SMYTH, of Wooton, grandson of Sir JOHN SMYTH, and 5th in descent from JOHN CARRINGTON, or SMITH, d. 1446, who was 5th in descent from Sir MICHAEL”
The Carew arms were recorded in England, c. 1446.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in York.
Yorkshire is the largest of the English counties, and it held more gentry families than any other. Land there was split among a great many households rather than a few, so a great many of them carried arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The history of the Carew family in England is deeply rooted in the social and political landscape of the Middle Ages. While the name is often associated with later influence in the southern regions of the country, historical records confirm that members of the family were established in the city of York by 1446. During this period, families like the Carews often moved between major urban centers to pursue opportunities in trade, law, or local government. Their presence in a northern hub like York suggests that the family was well-integrated into the professional class of the time. As they moved through different English counties, they adapted to the local customs and economic demands of each region. This mobility helped the family maintain their status and expand their reach across the kingdom over several generations.
A Breton place name referring to a fort or castle.


