Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'arg. à trois glands d'or aux coques de sin., les queues en bas, sans feuilles.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Mawn family lines. Documented in 2 countries.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'arg. à trois glands d'or aux coques de sin., les queues en bas, sans feuilles.”

The Mawn arms were recorded in Amsterdam, c. 1815.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
In the Netherlands, coats of arms were often used by noble families and those who held specific public offices. These arms were passed down through the generations to legitimate descendants. Younger branches of a family usually kept the original design without needing to add special marks. This system ensured that the family identity remained clear and consistent over many years.
The family name Mawn has roots that connect to the bustling urban environment of Amsterdam during the early nineteenth century. By 1815, the city was undergoing a major transition as it recovered from the Napoleonic era and began to reestablish itself as a global center for trade and commerce. Families living in Amsterdam at this time often occupied roles within the city’s complex merchant networks or skilled labor guilds. The presence of the Mawn name in the city records during this period suggests that the family was part of the growing population that helped stabilize the local economy after years of political instability. Because Amsterdam was a destination for people moving from across Europe, the name likely benefited from the city’s reputation as a place of opportunity and cultural exchange. These early residents were part of the foundational fabric of a city that was rapidly modernizing its administrative and social systems.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Or, a fesse cotised az”

The Mawn arms were recorded in England, c. 1620.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in York.
Yorkshire is the largest of the English counties, and it held more gentry families than any other. Land there was split among a great many households rather than a few, so a great many of them carried arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The family name Mawn has roots that trace back to the historic city of York in Northern England. By the year 1620, records confirm that members of the Mawn family were already established residents within this region. During the early seventeenth century, York was a bustling center of trade and religious activity, which likely influenced the daily lives and occupations of the family. The name itself is thought to be a variation of older regional surnames, possibly evolving from local dialects spoken in the northern counties. As the family lived in a city known for its ancient walls and long history, they were part of a community that was navigating the significant social and political shifts of the Stuart era. Their presence in York suggests that they were settled individuals who contributed to the local economy and social fabric of the city during a period of great transition in English history.
A Germanic personal name derived from the word for man.

