Coat of Arms & Family Crest Details
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'arg. à un écusson de gu. en abîme, enclos dans un double trècheur fleur. et c.-fleur. du même.”
A record of documented arms, meaning and origin, researched for the Scott family lines. Documented in 3 countries.
J. B. Rietstap, Armorial Général, Gouda: G. B. van Goor Zonen, 1884–87
Blazon (the actual original written record)“D'arg. à un écusson de gu. en abîme, enclos dans un double trècheur fleur. et c.-fleur. du même.”

The Scott arms were recorded in Britain, c. 1237.
Arms such as these were typically recorded in Kent.
Kent sits between London and the short crossing to Europe, and the trade passing through made it wealthy. Merchant families bought land with that money, and it was landowners who took coats of arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The surname Scott originated as a descriptive name used to identify people who had traveled from Scotland or who spoke Gaelic. While the name is most famously associated with the Scottish Borders, historical records confirm that members of the Scott family were firmly established in the English county of Kent by 1237. During this period, surnames were becoming increasingly common as a way for officials to track taxpayers and landowners. The Scott family in Kent rose to prominence through their involvement in local administration and land ownership, eventually becoming a significant part of the regional gentry. Their presence in the south of England so early in the thirteenth century suggests that the family name moved quickly across the British Isles through trade, political service, or migration. This early settlement in Kent highlights how a name originally tied to a specific northern identity could become deeply rooted in a completely different part of the country within just a few generations.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Or, on a bend az. a mullet pierced betw. two crescents of the first, a double tressure flory counterflory of the second”

The Scott arms were recorded in Selkirk, c. 1666.
Selkirkshire was small border country of forest and sheep walk. Its lairds were few and long-settled, and families who held the same ground for generations ended up with arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
Scottish heraldry is unique because it treats a coat of arms as a piece of personal property protected by law. Only one person can own a specific design at any given time. When a family grows, the head keeps the original shield while other relatives must apply for their own distinct version with slight changes to prove their specific identity.
The surname Scott originated as a descriptive name used to identify people from Scotland, or those who spoke Gaelic, when they traveled into England. By the time the family established a firm presence in the town of Selkirk by 1666, the name had become deeply rooted in the history of the Scottish Borders. During this era, families in the region often lived in a landscape defined by shifting loyalties and local disputes. The Scotts of the Borders were known for their resilience and their ability to adapt to the rugged environment of the southern uplands. As they settled in Selkirk, they became part of a tight-knit community that relied on agriculture and local trade to survive. Their presence in the town records from the mid-seventeenth century reflects a period when the family was transitioning from a nomadic or clan-based lifestyle to becoming established residents of a growing Scottish burgh.
Sir Bernard Burke, The General Armory of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales, London: Harrison & Sons, 1884
Blazon (the actual original written record)“Ar. a cross crosslet fitchée sa”

The Scott arms were recorded in Kent, c. 1380.
Kent sits between London and the short crossing to Europe, and the trade passing through made it wealthy. Merchant families bought land with that money, and it was landowners who took coats of arms.
This is where the arms were entered in the register. Families often moved to other parts of the country, so the same name can turn up in more than one region.
English heraldry allowed arms to be shared by all legitimate descendants of the original owner. These symbols were treated as personal property that moved through the generations to all children. While the eldest son kept the original design, other family members could use the same shield without needing to change it or register their own unique versions.
The surname Scott originated as a descriptive label used to identify people who had migrated from Scotland or who spoke the Gaelic language. By the time the name appeared in Kent records around 1380, it had transitioned from a simple nickname into a formal family name passed down through generations. During the late Middle Ages, individuals carrying this name often held positions of local influence and managed land within the English countryside. The presence of the Scott family in Kent suggests that they were part of a broader movement of people traveling south for trade, marriage, or service to the crown. Over time, these families integrated into the local English social structure while maintaining a name that served as a permanent reminder of their northern ancestral roots.
A Latin term referring to a Gaelic-speaking person from Ireland.